Practical guide for electrical cabinets and panels

Fire protection mistakes to avoid when protecting an electrical cabinet

Installing a fire suppression system is not simply a matter of fixing a generator inside an enclosure. Incorrect sizing, detection located too far away, unsuitable positioning or ignored ventilation can significantly reduce protection performance. Here are the most common mistakes and the best practices to follow.

Effective protection must be designed as one coherent system: detection, positioning, capacity, agent distribution, possible shutdown and retention of the extinguishing agent inside the protected volume.
Mistakes to avoid when protecting an electrical cabinet against fire.

Success depends as much on the study and installation as on the generator itself.

Size correctlyVolume alone is not enough to define the right architecture.
Detect in the right placeDetection must follow the areas most likely to overheat.
Respect the geometryWidth, height and compartments change agent distribution.
Plan for operationVentilation, shutdown, maintenance and continuity must be included.
Mistake 1

Sizing only according to volume

Volume is essential, but it does not describe the actual cabinet geometry or how the extinguishing agent will reach every area.

Width

A wide cabinet may require several generators or distributed positioning.

Height

Vertical distance affects distribution and positioning.

Obstacles

Components and cable routes may restrict agent movement.

Compartments

Partitions may create several independent volumes.

Sizing a fire suppression system according to volume and geometry.
Mistake 2

Installing the generator too low

Positioning the generator too low can move it away from upper risk areas, terminals and the first thermal signs. The generator should generally be installed at the top, in accordance with the enclosure geometry and manufacturer guidance.

1

Less favourable distribution

The agent may encounter more obstacles before reaching upper areas.

2

Too far from the risks

Terminals and sensitive components are often distributed across several rows.

3

Maintenance made harder

Poor positioning may obstruct access to equipment.

Fire suppression generator installed at the top of an electrical cabinet.
Mistake 3

Failing to cover the full width of the risk areas

Detection concentrated in the centre of the cabinet does not correctly monitor the ends. The route must cover all areas capable of initiating a fire.

01

Side terminals

Connections located on the sides must be included.

02

Several rows

Each significant level must be considered.

03

Power areas

Drives, power supplies and contactors must be followed.

04

Actual route

Cable length must be used to cover risks, not grouped in one place.

Linear heat detection covering the full width of an electrical cabinet.
Mistake 4

Ignoring compartments

A metal partition may prevent extinguishing agent distribution from one cell to another. Each compartment should be considered a potentially independent volume.

Single cell

One architecture may sometimes be sufficient.

Several cells

Each area requires its own assessment.

Several generators

Protection may need to be distributed.

Several detection routes

Each cell must have coherent monitoring.

Compartmented main switchboard protected by several fire suppression generators.
Mistake 5

Forgetting ventilation

Forced ventilation or permanent extraction can rapidly remove the extinguishing agent from the protected volume.

Natural ventilation

Openings and grilles must be included in the sizing study.

Forced ventilation

Fans may reduce the agent holding time.

Extraction

Airflow may carry the agent outside the cabinet.

Coordinated shutdown

Automatic stopping may be required when activation occurs.

Ventilation shutdown and monitoring interface for a fire suppression system.
Mistake 6

Detecting too late

Automatic suppression cannot act before detection. If detection is too far away, activation occurs after the fire has developed and damage may already be significant.

Early detection

  • Small flame
  • No propagation
  • Adjacent components preserved
  • Faster restart

Late detection

  • Cables destroyed
  • PLCs damaged
  • Drives and protection devices replaced
  • Long shutdown
Mistake 7

Selecting insufficient capacity

A system sized too tightly may become unsuitable when an obstacle, large width or ventilation changes agent distribution.

Safety margin

Selection must comply with the applicable sizing method.

Actual range

Distribution distance must match the enclosure.

Distributed architecture

Several units may be preferable to one.

Future changes

Cabinet modifications may change the requirement.

AeroXFireshield Industry range for large cabinets and high capacities.
Mistake 8

Ignoring business continuity

Extinguishing the fire is not always enough. The cost of downtime, equipment replacement and restart time must also be considered.

01

Production loss

Downtime may cost far more than the protection system.

02

Replacement lead time

Some PLCs or drives may require several weeks.

03

Reprogramming

Restart may require engineering and testing.

04

Early protection

The objective is to preserve the cabinet, not only the building.

Summary

The main mistakes and their consequences

MistakePossible consequenceBest practice
Sizing only by volumeArchitecture unsuitable for the actual geometry.Assess width, height, obstacles and compartments.
Installing the generator too lowLess favourable distribution and greater distance from risk areas.Use a high position in line with manufacturer guidance.
Not covering the full widthSide areas insufficiently monitored.Route the cable through all exposed areas.
Ignoring compartmentsAgent blocked by partitions.Assess each cell as a separate volume.
Forgetting ventilationAgent rapidly removed.Plan coordinated shutdown where necessary.
Detecting too lateMajor damage before activation.Install detection close to the components.
Selecting insufficient capacityUnsuitable concentration or coverage.Apply a complete sizing method.
Ignoring business continuityLong shutdown and high replacement costs.Aim for very early intervention.
Frequently asked questions

Electrical cabinet fire protection mistakes: key answers

What is the most common mistake when protecting an electrical cabinet?
The most common mistake is sizing the system only by volume without considering width, compartments, ventilation and the actual location of risk areas.
Is volume enough to choose a fire suppression system?
No. Volume determines a minimum capacity, but width, height, obstacles, partitions and airflow directly affect system performance.
Why should the generator be installed at the top?
A high position generally supports better distribution inside the enclosure and places the device closer to the areas where heat and smoke accumulate. Installation must still follow the manufacturer’s recommendations and the cabinet geometry.
Why must the full cabinet width be covered?
Because potential heat sources can be distributed across the whole width. Detection concentrated in the centre may leave side areas less effectively monitored.
Do compartments change the sizing?
Yes. A partition can block extinguishing agent distribution and require several generators or several detection routes.
Can a ventilated cabinet be protected?
Yes, provided airflow is assessed and, when necessary, fans or extractors are stopped in coordination with system activation.
Where should the heat-sensitive detection cable be installed?
It should follow risk areas such as terminals, connections, contactors, drives, power supplies, PLCs and other components likely to overheat.
How can incorrect sizing be avoided?
Provide dimensions, photos, compartment details, ventilation information, installed components and operational objectives so that a complete study can be carried out.

Avoid sizing and installation mistakes

Send dimensions, photos, compartments, equipment, ventilation constraints and operational objectives. We will define an architecture suited to your cabinet.